Five-tier intrapartum fetal heart rate interpretation
Pattern inputs
Tap one choice in each section. Use the i button only when you need a definition.
EMR / note summary
Important limitations
- The five-tier color matrix uses the later 2010 Parer-Hamilton Table 1 assignments, with the 2007 Table 2 risk/evolution/action output language.
- The 2010 operational definitions and priority rules are used for recurrence, deceleration severity, and selection when multiple findings coexist.
- Recurrent variable or late decelerations require at least 2 decelerations and involvement of at least 50% of contractions in a 20-minute window.
- The 20-minute window is a classification window, not a required delay before clinically indicated intervention.
- The NICHD Category I/II/III result is calculated independently from the entered tracing features and is not a conversion of the five-tier color.
- This tool does not incorporate fetal stimulation response. A failed stimulation response can be a Category II feature and should be considered clinically if testing was performed.
- Clinical context, uterine activity, stage of labor, response to interventions, and local protocol remain essential.
Sources
Five-tier framework: Tables 2 and 5 adapted and implemented with permission from Parer JT, Ikeda T. A framework for standardized management of intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:26.e1-26.e6. Tables 1 and 2 adapted and implemented with permission from Parer JT, Hamilton EF. Comparison of 5 experts and computer analysis in rule-based fetal heart rate interpretation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203.
NICHD 3-tier result: based on the 2008 NICHD Workshop standardized FHR interpretation system (Macones GA, Hankins GDV, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:661-666).
This calculator is an independent Perinatology.com implementation. No endorsement by the authors, journals, publishers, or NICHD is implied.